Political Belief Networks . Socio - cognitive Heterogeneity in American Public Opinion . ∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
Most research in public opinion and political sophistication relies on the assumption that Americans organize their political belief system according to the liberal and conservative categories. Yet not all of them do. We hypothesize that citizens’ sociodemographic profiles make them disposed to espouse different understandings of the political debate, and document systematic heterogeneity in Americans’ organization of their political attitudes over the last two decades. We interpret this diversity as the coexistence of multiple belief systems. Relational class analysis (RCA), a network-based method for detecting heterogeneity in collective patterns of opinion, is used to identify distinctive opinion structures – or belief networks – that are shared within different groups of respondents. The analysis of ANES data between 1984 and 2004 leads to the identification of three stable groups of American citizens: Ideologues, whose political attitudes strongly align with either liberal or conservative categories; Alternatives, who are instead morally conservative but economically liberal, or vice versa; and Agnostics, who exhibit weak associations between political beliefs. Respondents’ sociodemographic profiles, particularly their income and religiosity, stand at the core of the different ways in which they understand politics. When their social identities and related political interests are incompatible with the prescriptive liberal-conservative polarity (i.e., high earners with weak religious commitments), individuals gravitate toward alternative ways of conceptualizing the political debate. These results raise important methodological questions concerning the limitations of traditional analytical techniques that assume population homogeneity in the organization of political beliefs. ∗Please do not quote without permission. We thank Paul DiMaggio for useful comments. The usual disclaimer does apply. Direct all correspondence to Delia Baldassarri, 147 Wallace Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544. ([email protected]). †Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Princeton University. ‡Ph.D candidate, Department of Sociology, Princeton University.
منابع مشابه
Online social networks and their Impact on Political Participation in Iran
Undoubtedly, the expansion of participation and competition among social groups in political lifeis one of the major goals of political development. Meanwhile, given the significant changes taken place in the socio-political life of societies, the traditional tools affecting political participation have somewhat weakened. Today, social networking sites are consideredas one of the most important...
متن کاملCausality in Political Networks
Investigations of American politics have increasingly turned to analyses of political networks to understand public opinion, voting behavior, the diffusion of policy ideas, bill sponsorship in the legislature, interest group coalitions and influence, party factions, institutional development, and other empirical phenomena. While the association between political networks and political behavior ...
متن کاملThe Impact of Islamic Awakening on International Relations
Before the Islamic Awakening, the international system was the main shaping factor for the regional trends of Western Asia (Middle East). But after the political developments known as the Islamic Awakening or the Arab Spring, and the entry of new elements such as people and public opinion in the political equitation of the region, the regional trends of Western Asia has become more influential ...
متن کاملAmerican Decline in the Perspective of Democrats and Republicans: Otherization and Construction of American Identity in Election Speeches
American decline has received substantial attention from Iranian political and academic circles, with few analysts paying attention to the domestic debate on the concept. One of the overlooked aspects is the different ways that liberals and conservatives define and construct it. This difference is manifested in the perception of American identity and on the global role of the US, and intensifie...
متن کاملNeither ideologues nor agnostics: alternative voters' belief system in an age of partisan politics.
How do Americans organize their political beliefs? This article argues that party polarization and the growing prominence of moral issues in recent decades have catalyzed different responses by different groups of Americans. The article investigates systematic heterogeneity in the organization of political attitudes using relational class analysis, a graph-based method for detecting multiple pa...
متن کامل